OpenEvidence answers clinical questions at the point of care with cited medical evidence. Claire runs the visit — it interviews the patient, captures the history, and drafts the note. They solve different problems, and many physicians use both. Here is how the two compare and when each is the right call.
HIPAA · PHIPA · PIPEDA compliant
OpenEvidence is the superior choice for instant, citation-backed answers to clinical questions at the point of care — a free, physician-verified medical search tool that surfaces evidence from sources like NEJM and JAMA while you decide on diagnosis and treatment. Claire is a different kind of tool: an AI clinical partner that runs the visit itself — pre-visit patient intake, structured history-taking, and note drafting. They solve different problems, and many physicians use both — OpenEvidence to answer clinical questions, Claire to run intake, history, and documentation.
How Claire's intake-to-note workflow compares with the leading ambient scribes. Pricing is indicative and quote-based vendors change often — confirm current pricing with each vendor.
| Dimension | Claire | OpenEvidence |
|---|---|---|
| Core purpose | Runs the visit: intake, history, note | Answers clinical questions at the point of care |
| Pre-visit patient interview | ✓ Interviews the patient | — |
| Structured history-taking | ✓ Gathers your patient's history | — You provide the context |
| Clinical note drafting | ✓ | — |
| Point-of-care evidence & literature Q&A | Not the focus | ✓ Cited from NEJM, JAMA & more |
| Red-flag detection in the patient's history | ✓ | — |
| When it's used | Throughout the visit workflow | When you have a clinical question |
| Compliance | HIPAA · PHIPA · PIPEDA | HIPAA (verified-clinician platform) |
| Indicative pricing | $99/mo per provider | Free for verified clinicians |
| Best fit | Physicians wanting intake → history → note handled end to end | Physicians wanting fast, cited answers to clinical questions |
Comparison compiled from public vendor materials and third-party reviews, 2026. See sources below.
OpenEvidence is the right tool when you need a fast, citation-backed answer to a clinical question — drug interactions, guideline thresholds, differential reasoning — sourced from peer-reviewed literature like NEJM and JAMA. It is free for verified clinicians and used daily by a large share of US physicians. It does not run your patient intake, gather a structured history, or draft your notes, so many clinicians pair it with Claire rather than choosing between them.
Pricing and features are indicative and change frequently; confirm current details and Business Associate Agreement terms directly with each vendor.
See how Claire runs patient intake, captures the history, and drafts the clinical note. Tell us a little about your practice and we'll reach out to schedule a walkthrough.
